John Edwards: What’s not to like

November 5, 2007

Edwards at it again

Filed under: 2008 Primary, Internet, Iran, Transparency, flipping — is @ 6:47 pm

Since September, and as White House hints of military action against Iran intensify, the Edwards campaign has changed a key passage in its website’s discussion of Iran.

As of September 7, the passage read:

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will soon be deemed a terrorist organization by the U.S. As president, Edwards will ensure that such steps are not just more rhetoric, but actually lead to results.

The passage now reads:

Congress recently passed a bill to declare Iran’s Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. We saw in Iraq where such steps by Congress can lead President Bush. Edwards has announced his opposition to this bill.

The rest of the text of the 2,000-word foreign policy page is unchanged. And while this is obviously an update to keep pace with the news, the first version lacks any condemnation of the planned terrorist designation.

The Politico 11/5/07
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1107/A_change_on_Iran.html

September 8, 2007

Edwards: Iran actively supporting terrorists

Filed under: 2008 Primary, Iran, Israel, Terrorism — is @ 2:29 pm

John Edwards believes it is of the utmost importance that we prevent Iran from possessing nuclear weapons. Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is a politically unstable leader and an open supporter of terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas. Iran’s possession of nuclear weapons could also set off a regional nuclear arms race in an unstable region in the world, which would directly threaten US interests. As president, Edwards would take aggressive steps to resolve the situation and to protect the United States and our allies.

snip

Pressure Iran to stop supporting insurgents in Iraq. Iran is one of the most dangerous countries in the world, actively supporting terrorist and insurgent activity not only in Iraq but in other areas, such as Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. Our policy must aim to stamp out state-sponsored terrorism targeting Israel, our strongest ally in the region. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will soon be deemed a terrorist organization by the U.S. As president, Edwards will ensure that such steps are not just more rhetoric, but actually lead to results. He will increase both diplomatic contact with the Iranian government and diplomatic pressure on the Revolutionary Guard to shut down its support of insurgent activity in Iraq and in other areas, such as Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. He will also work with multilateral partners to forge a coalition to apply diplomatic and economic pressure to stop Iran’s involvement in insurgent and terrorist activity in Iraq.

John Edwards 08
http://johnedwards.com/issues/iran/

July 25, 2007

Edwards would not commit to meeting leaders of Iran, North Korea, Venezuela

Filed under: 2008 Primary, Cuba, Foreign Policy, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela — is @ 1:12 pm

Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton on Tuesday called rival Barack Obama’s debate response that he would be willing to meet with leaders of rogue nations “irresponsible and frankly naive.”

snip

Rival John Edwards, who campaigned in South Carolina on Tuesday, echoed Clinton’s comments in the debate.

“I would not commit myself on the front end openly to meet with [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad, [North Korean leader] Kim Jong Il, [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez,” Edwards told reporters in McClellanville, S.C. “I think there’s a real potential that would be used as a propaganda tool.”

Associated Press 7/25/07
http://www.buffalonews.com/180/story/126613.html

February 21, 2007

Greatest Threat: Iran Acquires Nuclear Weapon

Filed under: AIPAC, Iran, Israel, flipping — is @ 5:19 pm

Columnist Peter Bart reports that Edwards told a Hollywood fundraiser last month that the possibility that Israel would bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities is perhaps the greatest short-term threat to world peace.

Edwards’ spokesman Jonathan Prince says the article is erroneous. He says Edwards says one of the greatest short-term threats to world peace is Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Bart says Variety stands by its report. The host of the fundraiser, Adam Venit of the Endeavor talent agency, didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.

Associated Press 2/21/07
http://www.wwaytv3.com/node/501

February 3, 2007

“Telling different audiences what they each want to hear”

Filed under: Iran, Israel, flipping — is @ 12:31 am

Let me say first off that I like Edwards. I always have. And I’d very much like to go along with the conventional wisdom that he “backed off” his hawkish Iran comments when he talked to the Prospect yesterday.But, really, does anyone believe that? I don’t. Instead, he was engaging in Politics 101: telling different audiences what they each want to hear. When he’s talking to an Israeli conference, he emphasizes the supreme danger Iran presents and implies strongly that military action is a real possibility, while barely even mentioning the idea of engagement and economic aid. When he’s talking to a liberal American magazine, he emphasizes engagement and economic aid and downplays the possibility of military action as vanishingly unlikely during an Edwards presidency.

Technically, there was no contradiction between what he said in these two venues. At the Israeli conference he did mention direct engagement with Iran, even if it was only in response to a question at the end. And with the Prospect, he did say that all options had to be left on the table — including, presumably, military action. Still, you’d barely know it was the same person talking if you read both conversations with no names attached.

There’s nothing new about this. It’s standard issue politics. But the internet is making this game harder to play, because every word you speak, at every venue, is now easily accessible to people who aren’t quite as jaded about this kind of thing as most political reporters are. People like me. And I’ll tell you: I’d sure feel a lot better if even a small part of Edwards’ comments to the Prospect had made their way into his speech at Herzliya.

Washington Monthly, 2/3/07
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2007_02/010678.php

January 22, 2007

Herzliya conference on “Israel’s national security”

Filed under: AIPAC, Iran, Israel — is @ 10:18 pm

It sounds like the stuff that conspiracy theories are made of. In a coastal resort near Tel Aviv, senior Israeli politicians and generals confer with top officials and politicians from Washington to discuss the threat of a nuclear Iran. In any good conspiracy theory, however, these talks would be going on in secret – preferably in an underground bunker. In fact the Herzliya conference on “Israel’s national security” is taking place perfectly openly in a smart hotel. And I am in the audience.

The Israel participation is, as one would expect, high level. The conference is scheduled to close with a speech from Ehud Olmert, the prime minister. The lunch-time speaker yesterday was Benjamin Netanyahu, the Likud leader, and maybe the next prime minister. We’re hearing from the foreign minister, the defence minister and a string of present and former generals.

But what has really struck me is the number of top Americans who have bothered to come over for the conference. The speaker at dinner last night was Gordon England, America’s deputy defence secretary; earlier in the day we heard from Nick Burns, the number three at the State Department. Several contenders for the presidency in 2008 have also felt obliged to tip their hat to Herzliya. Mitt Romney, who is probably second favourite for the Republican nomination, is turning up in person. John McCain, the GOP front-runner is appearing by satellite, so is Rudy Giuliani. For the Democrats, John Edwards is also scheduled to make a satellite address. I cannot think of any other country in the world that could summon up this level of American participation for a conference like this. Certainly not Britain.

Also well represented among the participants are well-known hawks like Richard Perle, Jim Woolsey (the former CIA director), Newt Gingrich and Jose Maria Aznar, the former Spanish prime minister. A lot of these chaps were very prominent in the drive to go to war in Iraq. Now, flushed by their undoubted success there, they are turning their attention to Iran.

There is no doubt that the war drums are beating pretty loudly here in Herzliya. The main topics of conversation that keep coming back and back – in the corridors and also in the conference hall – is how close is Iran to the bomb. Can anything short of military action stop the Iranians? If it comes to bombing, could the Israelis do it alone – or would they have to rely on the United States? Would President Bush give the order? (This place is full of people who claim to have spoken to somebody who has spoken to the president about this very issue, but they all seem to have different stories).

Financial Times 1/22/07
http://blogs.ft.com/rachmanblog/2007/01/israelis_americ.html#more

January 19, 2007

Greatest Threat: Israel Bombs Iran

Filed under: 2008 Primary, Iran, Israel, flipping — is @ 5:04 pm

The aggressively photogenic John Edwards was cruising along, detailing his litany of liberal causes last week until, during question time, he invoked the “I” word — Israel. Perhaps the greatest short-term threat to world peace, Edwards remarked, was the possibility that Israel would bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities. As a chill descended on the gathering, the Edwards event was brought to a polite close.

Variety 1/19/07
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117957727.html?categoryid=1&cs=1

June 8, 2006

AIPAC trip

Filed under: AIPAC, Iran, Israel — is @ 1:05 am

“We cannot allow Iran to have nuclear weapons,” he declared, endorsing America’s current approach of working with the Europeans using diplomatic levers.

But he said the “carrots” on offer have to come with heavy pressure, such as “serious sanctions.”

In terms of the “stick” of military strikes, he said, “I would never take any option off the table.”

-snip

“Israel is in the unfortunate position of having to act without an agreement. I think American [officials] are supportive of that and want to be helpful in that effort – including me,” he said.

Those words were stronger than those used by President George W. Bush to assess the realignment plan during Olmert’s visit to the Oval Office last month.

“I would call them bold ideas. These ideas could lead to a two-state solution if a pathway to progress on the road map is not open in the period ahead,” Bush said at a press conference during the visit. “No party should prejudice the outcome of negotiations on a final status agreement, [but] the prime minister’s ideas could be an important step toward the peace we both support.”

-snip

Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, Defense Minister Amir Peretz and Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter were among the government officials who met with Edwards during his four-day trip, which ended Wednesday. His schedule also included meetings with Likud chairman Binyamin Netanyahu, Labor secretary-general Ephraim Sneh and former PA finance minister Salaam Fayad.

The visit, Edward’s second, included a helicopter tour surveying the route of the security barrier, the northern border and the Golan Heights.

“It gave a very physical sense of the threat the Israeli people face every day,” he said.

The trip was arranged by the American-Israel Education Foundation, an AIPAC sister organization. Each year the foundation hosts dozens of congressmen, presidential candidates, political consultants and other American political heavyweights.

Jerusalem Post, 6/8/06
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1149572637421&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

February 24, 2002

“I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country.”

Filed under: Iran, Iraq War, North Korea — is @ 1:48 am

“I mean, we have three different countries [Iran, Iraq, North Korea] that, while they all present serious problems for the United States — they’re dictatorships, they’re involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction — you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries. I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country.”

CNN Late Edition, 2/24/02

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0202/24/le.00.html

Blog at WordPress.com.